10 posts tagged “work”
I have a new job, my first in a while. I'm hesitant to say much about this-- to me-- novel situation, as if I'll jinx the whole setup, and wake up tomorrow with a dreadfully familiar sensation of nowhere to go. So, about the job-- eh. But lemme tell you about the commute.
No wheels involved. None. Am I working from home? No, at least at present. I'm working in a nondescript corporate office building, all very Dilbert-esque in its population of suits and ponytails, its standard inventory of cubicles, fluorescent lights, and beige melamine. I doubt that there's a dog or foosball table anywhere in the whole tower: there are just some places dot-com culture can't penetrate. Mornings, I ride the elevator up with twelve other silent robots, like the delivery of the Morlock-like workers in Metropolis. Evenings, the reverse.
And then I walk home.
I haven't had a walking commute for about fifteen years. I'd forgotten how pleasant it can be, even if the place you're going to or returning from isn't your ideal of how to spend eight or so hours of your precious, finite time on Earth. For one thing, a walking commute always take the same amount of time. I'm not at the mercy of any of the Bay Area's dysfunctional transit agencies; I'm not on any of our clogged roadways. This predictability seems to have removed about ninety percent of the stress I used to feel when commuting to other jobs. And, unlike on my bike commutes, I'm not being yelled at by idiot motorists contesting my right to exist. I'm just-- walking.
It's so easy, and unfortunately rare. When did you last walk to work?
But we were wrong. Web 2.0 is all about...forms.
Want to use Web 2.0? Fill out this form, or that one, and still others. Web 2.0 requires that you apply for membership, it seems.
Meanwhile, my Web working days are filled increasingly with building, styling, and debugging forms. My hours are spent with name/value pairs, tabindex, and IE's z-index bug on dropdowns. If people ask me what I do for a living, I'm ready to say, "I make empty boxes. Lots of them."
So, yes, it can get tedious. My mind wanders to daydreams of my weekend, lunchtime, or cross-browser CSS3. Today, though, I amused myself by actually reading the content of the form I was building. Great idea-- there's entertainment value in trying to guess just why this form anticipates a user with citizenship and a postal address in...Antarctica.
But that doesn't mean I have to hard-code it.
It's enough time for me, for instance, to walk from the neighborhood library to home. It's sufficient time to set a frittata at medium heat. I can get through most of my e-mail in ten minutes. I can also get dangerously, thoroughly bored with working after ten minutes.
If I were in the same state of fitness that I was when I ran track in high school, I could run the 880 five times in ten minutes.
I took ten minutes the other morning to sort out my sock drawer. Only ten minutes! Four of those were spent traveling back and forth to the wastebasket, dithering in the hallway, wondering how distressed a poor old sock can be before it's rejected as a donation to Goodwill.
Ten minutes: in the Bay Area that's enough time to get a burrito at a well-run taqueria. You can get from West Oakland to Montgomery BART in less than ten minutes. You can turn on any radio station, any time of day, and with ten minutes there will be a traffic report. The report will tell you all the places you cannot possibly go within ten minutes.
In the meantime you might fantasize for a few-- let's say ten-- minutes about trading your corporate job for some kind of romantic home-based business, such as piloting a river barge down the Seine.
I attended the first day of TransitCampBayArea, but couldn't attend the second, though this would've been the perfect moment for me to present my thoughts on why people don't use transit.
The other speakers had wonderful, data-supported presentations about this very question, yet there was less mention of prejudice against transit users. Yes, prejudice-- seems a strong word, doesn't it? But try getting around a U.S. city on the bus, and you'll discover just how low-class your form of transport renders you.
The folks at TransitCamp would've been a sympathetic audience. As we introduced ourselves at the beginning, I mentioned that I'd let my driver's license expire in 1989, and have never owned a car. I received applause, even from the people representing the car share services. This was not a roomful of stereotypical anarchist crusties, however, but a pretty diverse crowd of transit planners and tech-inclined transit enthusiasts. The day proceeded with the yang of gee-whiz Web app mashups being countered by the yin of the sobering fact that many transit users have little or no experience using the Web. It was a thrilling, uncommon experience to meet so many people who thought there was nothing wrong with my
mode of getting around.
This isn't the usual reception I get when I state, "I don't drive." Recruiters and potential employers seem especially troubled by the phrase. I've even had the verbs distorted, then repeated back to me as I can't drive, and there will be an odd sound to the speaker's tone: it's the static of that person's thinking furiously, "Well, why can't she drive? Does she have a weird, disfiguring handicap we have to pretend to overlook? Was her license yanked after a bunch of DUI's? Or does she have some even more sordid past?"
Sometimes I persuade these types that I'm as normal as anyone on four wheels, and I'll be invited to an interview in what, from a transit user's perspective, is the worst land use in human history: the office park. There I must remember that I'm highly motivated! excited! totally enthused! about meeting the people at a company which surrounds itself with a moat of parking, apparently to protect against the contagion of the bus stopping four times daily half a mile away.
Some people are thoroughly, even comically, ungracious when they hear that I don't drive. At a women's group the other night one person huffed and snorted when I offhandedly mentioned that I don't get to the South Bay from Oakland very much because it takes so long on transit. My tone had been mild-- a mere statement of facts-- but hers was of unbalanced outrage. It was as if I had confessed to not paying taxes or some other civic lapse. It's a lot like how some people respond to hearing you say you're a vegetarian: they whip out furious, pre-emptive diatribes, trying to end the conversation right then and there. But it doesn't really end: it leaves me thinking, "What are they afraid of?"
In today's New York Times, the story of the "Goth Bonnie and Clyde," and news of a life philosophy I can't find too objectionable:
On the other hand, Ms. Boyd, employed most recently as a seamstress and a stripper, was fonder of spending money than of working, said her former husband, Mike Stuckey, who has had custody of their 5-year-old son since their divorce.
“Her dream job was not working,” Mr. Stuckey said.
I spent two and a half hours trying to get home from work yesterday. I thought I was catching the same old bus, but the planners at AC Transit decided to play an early April Fool's prank on me. That almost-tolerable forty-five minute ride I used to have to get to BART? An hour fifteen last night, thanks to the new, convoluted bus route.
This morning's commute to the office was uneventful. It took the usual two hours.
I am crinkly-eyed and weary. I leave home around sunrise and get home after dark. A lot of things in my life aren't getting done, thanks to my absence or bone-tiredness. But this will soon change.
I've resigned.
Nobody at work seemed very surprised; they've lived in the Bay Area long enough to know how thoroughly soul-robbing getting one's self around this region can be. Whole lunchtimes could be spent with each of us sharing our favorite ways to game the system, whether by bus, bike, BART, or Bug.
Me, I'm tired of negotiating the schedules of rival transit agencies, tired of accommodating a moving-vehicle sequence more delicately timed than the chase scene in Bullitt. And... I'm just tired.
Three weeks into my new job, the one with the two-hour commute each way. It's midwinter, so I leave and return home in pitch darkness, which is a mercy in its way, considering how filthy the apartment is now that I'm too preoccupied to clean it (as is, ahem, its other resident). Today, the solstice, I'm starting to understand the excitement pagan Europeans felt at this time of year: the sun will return, pushing aside darkness only a minute or two more each day. The sun is coming back, bringing a minute or two more of illumination that isn't from a Godawful 1000-watt fluorescent light bulb like the ones above my cringing head in my work cubicle.
Tomorrow night I'll be in the Mojave desert. The stars will shine crisply in the cold, dry air: I never minded the dark of night when I lived in the country, and could see the stars and moon. I will be able to watch the sunrise at leisure, rather than in a state of suspension from a commuter train platform. The light will intensify, the hillsides will gather detail, and I'll be able to just watch it all, unperturbed by station announcements or train whistles: watch it all, as long as it lasts-- a minute or two earlier than it was this morning.
Yet another job interview, with a totally different company. I feel like one of those "secret shoppers," assessing a dizzying gamut of startups, agencies, firms, megacorporations, LLCs and LLPs.
Going for caffeine today-- it's an all-day interview.
Glanced at my credit report recently. Unlike many, it didn't include noticeable errors, except an irritating little statement: "ALSO KNOWN AS: MELANIE KNOWLES."
No, I'm not. When I married, I did not change my name. I saw no reason to-- my husband's family is prolific; it's not like the name "Knowles" will die out-- and I was established in my life as Melanie Archer. I never, ever referred to myself as Melanie Knowles, legally or not, and, aside from the credit bureaux, nobody else has, either.
Meanwhile, my husband's credit report does not give him an automatic alias. No, his marriage didn't trigger any gratuitous renaming. He's unchanged, as far as they're concerned.
And so I'm made to look like one of those Most Wanted desperadoes in the post office, with an alternate identity, an alias, something I assume to work a con or scam, just because of an outdated assumption that the female spouse assumes the male one's family name.
It was pretty hard to pass up Ajaxian's latest conference, being both in my region and interesting to me. I didn't investigate the gender ratio at this one, because I was cynically confident there were no female speakers. But I was really intrigued by the conference's emphasis on user interface design, the front end of things, and so off I went, double-X chromosomes and all.
Some observations, in no particular order:
- Why are Java developers so heavily represented in the Ajax realm? Aside from the lamentable renaming of LiveScript, I see very little connection.
- Why was Mark Meeker's presentation about building accessible Ajax so sparsely attended? For that matter, why wasn't attendance mandatory?
- Where has YSlow been all my life?
-
- Which bright spark thought up the Devo hat logo for jQuery?
Aside from the gender imbalance, I was bothered by the frequent misuse of "it's" on many of the presentation slides. If I were the conference czarina, I would sentence all aspiring presenters to confinement with the AP or Chicago style manuals, or, hell, even just Strunk and White, until they can cite the rule for the appropriate use of "it's" from memory.
