We've heard a bunch of these recently:
Most of the ideas for wrestling with the economy and unemployment were more traditional and predictable...A strongly advanced remedy was buying, or "buyology" as a San Francisco Examiner editor put it..The Los Angeles Times ran a feature entitled "Now Is the Time to Buy," which pointed out opportunities for cheaper purchases brought by the deflated dollar. The Times exhorted consumers not only to step up their purchases, but also to buy locally manufactured items. San Francisco's celebration of "Buy at Home Week"...provided no remarkable results in retail sales figures.
Now, don't go searching the recent archives for either paper mentioned to find this upbeat hooey. The strategies above were proposed in 1930. Yes, for the twelve months following Black Tuesday, we were convinced things were mighty different out West. Cynicism and nay-saying were for those over-educated slickers back East.
I admit my first impulse on hearing that Bay Area real estate prices have tumbled from the insane to the merely stratospheric was full-on Schadenfreude. But news of exurban foreclosures has chastened me: the nationwide recession is here. Just because I don't personally know any people ruined by sleazy mortgages doesn't mean my life will proceed as before.
Instead of heading out to indulge in "buyology," I'm thriftily haunting the UC Berkeley library, grabbing books about the Great Depression. A lot of the titles have been checked out already: it looks like somebody's getting a jump on researching the same topic.
It's enough time for me, for instance, to walk from the neighborhood library to home. It's sufficient time to set a frittata at medium heat. I can get through most of my e-mail in ten minutes. I can also get dangerously, thoroughly bored with working after ten minutes.
If I were in the same state of fitness that I was when I ran track in high school, I could run the 880 five times in ten minutes.
I took ten minutes the other morning to sort out my sock drawer. Only ten minutes! Four of those were spent traveling back and forth to the wastebasket, dithering in the hallway, wondering how distressed a poor old sock can be before it's rejected as a donation to Goodwill.
Ten minutes: in the Bay Area that's enough time to get a burrito at a well-run taqueria. You can get from West Oakland to Montgomery BART in less than ten minutes. You can turn on any radio station, any time of day, and with ten minutes there will be a traffic report. The report will tell you all the places you cannot possibly go within ten minutes.
In the meantime you might fantasize for a few-- let's say ten-- minutes about trading your corporate job for some kind of romantic home-based business, such as piloting a river barge down the Seine.
Many people spent that bright sunny morning of February 3 preparing for Super Bowl parties. Our household was a-twitter about absinthe.
The U.S. government was finally convinced that the dangers of drinking absinthe were more likely those of drinking adulterants such as wood alcohol and copper sulfate, and so removed most of the bans on the production and sale of the fabled green liqueur in 2007. For the first time since 1912, we may pour a U.S.-made jigger of "the green fairy" into a suitable glass, add some ice water or champagne, and watch the louche form. No more pretending with Pernod, nor with that ersatz Czech stuff: the real experience is available...
...for a hefty sum of both money and time. My husband joined a line of dozens, maybe even hundreds, of the absinthe-curious when St. George Spirits opened its doors for one of its infrequent sales of its notorious product. A couple of hours later, he was back home with a neat little bottle of delicately green-yellow liqueur. Both of us paused before tasting; was this really safe?
It was safe enough we invited our friend Jeanne over to help us devise absinthe cocktails. Jeanne, we determined, would have the mixology expertise to help us find the right ingredients to match such a strong anise flavor. She didn't disappoint: Jeanne arrived with printouts of vintage recipes and a sack of brandy, rye whiskey, and ginger syrup.
So far none of us writes like Baudelaire, nor paints like Van Gogh. Perhaps effects are cumulative.
The "Jeanne"
- 1 tsp sugar
- 1-1/2oz rye whiskey
- 1 Dash absinthe
- 2 Dashes Angostura bitters
- 1 lemon peel twist
- crushed ice
Place ice in an Old Fashioned glass to chill it. In another glass, mix sugar and bitters, then add some ice to chill. Remove ice from Old Fashioned glass; pour in absinthe to coat the glass, then pour out excess. Add rye whiskey, the bitters and sugar mixture, and the lemon twist.
The "Michael"
- 1 oz tequila
- 2 oz absinthe
Pour into shot glass.
The "Melanie"
- 1/2 jigger absinthe
- 2 jiggers fresh orange juice
- Chilled Prosecco or Cava
Pour the absinthe and orange juice into a champagne flute. Fill the rest of the glass with the sparkling wine.
Not even a week after gushing about author Margaret B. Jones and her bungalow in Oregon, the New York Times joins the chorus of shocked! shocked! observers when the author confesses that her would-be hipster literary masterpiece about gang life in South Central L.A. is, like, a novel. You know, like, fiction.
There's a bunch of furious commentary. It reminds me of the indignation that the unveiling of JT LeRoy provoked: you mean that all that writing we praised for its beauty, craft, and grace wasn't about the author's actual life after all? Well, take back everything we said then! Yeah, come back when you're authentically fucked up and we can get vicarious thrills reading about it!
I don't read these kinds of books, and don't understand their appeal. So I have to ask everyone else: why should it matter that Margaret B. Jones is really goody-two-shoes Margaret Seltzer? Actually, isn't it even more impressive that somebody not in the life can write so convincingly about it?
My hands are cramped. Shouldn't have typed so much today. The day was refreshingly clear, and all I did with it was squint at the monitor. Never got full success with the project I was working on, but I typed, even though my hands hurt and it would've been a better use of daylight to sit in the garden drawing instead.
I diverted myself on alternate browser tabs with descriptions by the few Western tourists who have visited North Korea. The accounts were perversely fascinating: the country is apparently all monuments and few people.
I formed a desire to go there. Thought about reporting that on my Facebook profile, then worried how that would look: there isn't anything to qualify my interest in visiting North Korea. There's no option on the widget where I can write, "I'm just painfully curious about visiting about the only place on Earth free from commercial advertising."
Yet imagine a stroll down one of Pyongyang's reportedly sparkling clean, Nuremberg-scaled avenues, the ones with scarcely any vehicles and even fewer people using them, the ones that look like the eerily empty boulevards in Atget's long-exposure photographs. The sun, or the rain; the pavement; the gray stone of the monuments and the red paper of the propaganda billboards-- all might seem merely picturesque, even coherent. No element would shout or fidget as ads must: none would have to drown out the others.
I attended the first day of TransitCampBayArea, but couldn't attend the second, though this would've been the perfect moment for me to present my thoughts on why people don't use transit.
The other speakers had wonderful, data-supported presentations about this very question, yet there was less mention of prejudice against transit users. Yes, prejudice-- seems a strong word, doesn't it? But try getting around a U.S. city on the bus, and you'll discover just how low-class your form of transport renders you.
The folks at TransitCamp would've been a sympathetic audience. As we introduced ourselves at the beginning, I mentioned that I'd let my driver's license expire in 1989, and have never owned a car. I received applause, even from the people representing the car share services. This was not a roomful of stereotypical anarchist crusties, however, but a pretty diverse crowd of transit planners and tech-inclined transit enthusiasts. The day proceeded with the yang of gee-whiz Web app mashups being countered by the yin of the sobering fact that many transit users have little or no experience using the Web. It was a thrilling, uncommon experience to meet so many people who thought there was nothing wrong with my
mode of getting around.
This isn't the usual reception I get when I state, "I don't drive." Recruiters and potential employers seem especially troubled by the phrase. I've even had the verbs distorted, then repeated back to me as I can't drive, and there will be an odd sound to the speaker's tone: it's the static of that person's thinking furiously, "Well, why can't she drive? Does she have a weird, disfiguring handicap we have to pretend to overlook? Was her license yanked after a bunch of DUI's? Or does she have some even more sordid past?"
Sometimes I persuade these types that I'm as normal as anyone on four wheels, and I'll be invited to an interview in what, from a transit user's perspective, is the worst land use in human history: the office park. There I must remember that I'm highly motivated! excited! totally enthused! about meeting the people at a company which surrounds itself with a moat of parking, apparently to protect against the contagion of the bus stopping four times daily half a mile away.
Some people are thoroughly, even comically, ungracious when they hear that I don't drive. At a women's group the other night one person huffed and snorted when I offhandedly mentioned that I don't get to the South Bay from Oakland very much because it takes so long on transit. My tone had been mild-- a mere statement of facts-- but hers was of unbalanced outrage. It was as if I had confessed to not paying taxes or some other civic lapse. It's a lot like how some people respond to hearing you say you're a vegetarian: they whip out furious, pre-emptive diatribes, trying to end the conversation right then and there. But it doesn't really end: it leaves me thinking, "What are they afraid of?"
A highlight of last year's San Francisco Silent Film Festival was a presentation by the charismatic Serge Bromberg of Lobster Films: Retour de Flamme, a potpourri of early film rarities. For me, the most memorable of these was Le Cochon Danseur: short, absurd, and a hundred years old.
It would be super just for the weather; that outrageous storm over the weekend is now a bad memory. Today is bright, clear, and mild in the East Bay. Turning out for the primary election can be easily incorporated into an early springtime walk.
The newspapers all have bazillion-point type on their front page headlines, frantic to say anything definite about the primary. The televisions over at Gold's Gym seem permanently tuned to one of those talking heads political shows. Barack Obama supporters, nearly all young, Caucasian university students, cluster at the neighborhood intersections holding endearingly crude handmade posters urging motorists to honk in support of Obama.
Supporters of the other presidential candidates seem unconcerned about my neighborhood. There's a die-hard across the street with her "JOHN EDWARDS 2008" sign still posted on her lawn, but little other overt sentiment. We didn't even get the usual dead forest of campaign mailers. But it's only the primary--- not the final episode for this show.
The Ron Paul campaign did remind us of its presence by virtue of an airplane overhead trailing a "RON PAUL REVOLUTION" banner. However, all of us in the Grand Lake neighborhood were on the reverse side of the banner, so the only letters we could read spelled "LOVE." Awww-- a valentine!
Cool and me ???? Kiss my friend ! read more
on A Day with Megabus